Revenue Is There, But Not From the Same Sources
While industry revenue is forecasted to grow from 10.4% in 2005 to 11.6% in 2006, the industry is deriving the greatest percentage of newly booked revenue from value-added services, namely temporary or contract staffing and professional services. More companies are relying on contingent workforces than ever before. It is estimated that in 2006, as many as two-fifths of newly created jobs are first offered on a temporary basis. That's a fourfold increase in the growth of contract labor in just 10 years.
While the job orders being placed with traditional contingent agencies aren't drying up, the increased use of contingent labor and a confluence of technology driving candidate visibility is forcing such firms to change or die. With the opportunity to maintain minimum placement volume needed to sustain a business in jeopardy, many contingent search providers are increasing the scope of value-added services they offer, and are finding clients more receptive than ever.
The contingent search industry has long been one that defined success too early, in that it never sought out opportunities to extend the value of its services beyond the initial placement transaction. This lack of prior industry development has made the industry ripe for a series of progressive, qualitative transition cycles. Early leaders embracing this transition are already blurring the lines between temporary staffing, contingent staffing, retained staffing, professional services, and training. With this transition firms like Adecco and Kelly, which had few urban competitors, today have thousands, ranging from local companies of one to foreign companies of thousands.
The Confluence of Technology Driving Candidate Visibility
Traditional contingent search firms take advantage of their ability to find candidates who have not been found by companies or who have been overlooked. It is, for the most part, a low-volume, high-margin business. However, the confluence of numerous technologies that service the recruiting function and the proliferation of the Internet have made a majority of the world's workforce more visible to corporations and, in the process, eroded the value proposition contingent search providers once banked on.
In this new era, contingent search professionals are finding it a lot harder to find a candidate who:
- Doesn't appear on a lock-out list (a list of the agencies' other clients or strategic partners of the client organization);
- Hasn't already been introduced to the company via the employee referral program; or
- Doesn't already appear in one of a multitude of databases that employers have purchased access to; or
- Hasn't already applied directly to the company sometime in the past four years; or
- Presents a background so stellar that companies don't balk at paying search fees.
In short, the inventory of talent that contingent search providers can trade upon for permanent placement is in extremely short supply.
New Services on the Horizon
As stated earlier, those agencies embracing change are finding more ways to extend the value inside the organization. The most common extension is, of course, the move into supporting temporary labor. While many large service providers like Randstad and Kelly have the market economics to secure the largest companies in a metropolitan area, a number of small- and medium-sized firms desperately need help leveraging contingent staff.
In addition to temporary staffing, a number of other potential services are on the horizon, some that many large organizations should consider taking advantage of. Those we find most interesting include:
Outsourced Referral Program Management
Employee referral programs are quickly becoming the predominate source of hire inside most organizations. Those firms that lead their industries in hires attributed to employee referral can attest that providing world-class customer service to both referees and referrals is essential to maintaining program momentum.
Unfortunately, most HR organizations are not adept at even spelling world-class customer service, let alone delivering it. For years, HR organizations have focused on containing costs and enabling self-service, two objectives that don't always drive customer satisfaction. Contingent search firms, on the other hand, have built their businesses around customer service, servicing not only the client but the candidate as well.
By outsourcing the management of the employee referral program to a trusted search provider, the client organization could gain several key benefits, including:
- The search provider could more easily ramp up and down the human resources attached to the client employee referral program to maintain pre-established customer service standards.
- Under a split-type agreement, the search provider could provide referrals with additional placement services should the client organization opt not to hire, thereby creating a revenue source to self-fund the employee referral program.
- The search provider could provide more advanced analytics regarding the success or failure of the employee referral program because traditionally agencies have been more adept than HR functions have been at applying metrics internally.
- The search provider could leverage economies of scale and build internal staffing proficiencies in marketing and sales skills to support the employee referral program that would not make sense for small- and medium-sized firms to invest in.
External Brand Assessment
While most lock-out list scenarios prevent companies from using an agency to raid another employer, they don't prevent organizations from hiring services to help identify and understand their position in the market as employers. Because contingent search providers have a proven ability to blueprint a competing talent organization, target specific talent, and establish contact with said talent, it makes sense to leverage that ability to identify and gauge an employer's reputation in specific talent markets.
Professional recruiters may be more adept at getting an honest perception than market researchers because they have a proven ability to keep talent talking. Under such a scenario, search providers would:
- Build contact lists of target talent in competing organizations.
- Establish relationships with said talent over time.
- Use the established relationship to gather research on how the client is perceived in key areas by the target talent.
- Aggregate the research and report back to the client perceptions that limit the client's ability to attract said talent.
Competitive Landscape Mapping
Nearly every contingent staffing professional can tell stories about when it introduced a candidate to a client who came from a competitor whom the client was unaware of. While companies like to think that their marketing teams are adept at identifying potential competitors, staffing professionals often do a much better job at mapping who-competes-against-whom for customers, and especially for employees.
They are more adept at recognizing industries that hire compatible talent, and much more adept at identifying new entrants to the talent market. Client organizations can use contingent staffing firms to build competitive talent landscape maps as a precursor to organizational benchmarking initiatives. Maps can help insure that organizations have a realistic picture of who is after what talent in a specific geography, and what each player's strengths and weaknesses are.
While the visibility of candidates may have improved, the ability of the typical corporate recruiter to acquire said candidates has not. Most corporate recruiters are phone averse, and seem to think that proactively contacting any potential candidate before they have applied to you is an ethics violation!
As such, a number of contingent search firms have started offering training seminars and certification programs that help prepare recruiters to be successful in the role of corporate recruiter. Some aspects of these training programs focus on sourcing techniques, while others focus on how to engage candidates and deal with the all too common objections. A number of Fortune 200 companies now rely heavily on recruiters who have undergone said training.
Under this service, contingent search providers:
- Recruit entry-level recruiters onto their payroll.
- Train the recruiters in full life-cycle recruiting or a life-cycle specialty, depending on client needs.
- Provide the newly trained recruiters with on-the-job experience for a minimum period of time.
- Contract out or place the new recruiters with client organizations and guarantee their on-the-job performances for a set period of time.
Another service that is growing in popularity among traditional contingent agencies is vendor management. Many corporations are horrible at managing the multitude of services that support the staffing function and could not optimize the deployment of searches or resources if the future of their staffing function depended on it.
Despite years of challenges and a host of software products that have sprung up to do the job, most companies still need help. Because agencies are generally better at using metrics internally and have a profit incentive to use resources wisely, outsourcing vendor management to a contingent staffing vendor again makes sense. They can leverage the same metrics that they use internally for assigning recruiters to job orders to assign subcontractors to accounts. Because their profits are tied to helping you maximize both the efficiency and effectiveness of your staffing efforts, you build in accountability to a corporate function that traditionally hasn't been held accountable.
Contingent search firms have existed for years and will continue to exist for years to come. But like all industries, the contingent staffing industry is not subject to life as we have known it forever. It too must evolve — now more than ever. The position of search firms is one that lends organizations a great deal of power to identify what does and does not make sense to do internally. In short, it gives organizations the strength needed to force trusted search providers to become mini-recruitment process outsourcers. Are you progressive enough to leverage your partners?
Dr. John Sullivan ([email protected]) is a well-known thought leader in HR. He is a frequent speaker and advisor to Fortune 500 and Silicon Valley firms. Formerly the chief talent officer for Agilent Technologies (the 43,000-employee HP spin-off), he is now a professor of management at San Francisco State University. He was called the "Michael Jordan of Hiring" by Fast Company magazine. More recruiting articles by Dr. Sullivan can be found in the ER Daily archives. Information about his numerous other articles, books and manuals about recruiting and HR can be found at www.drjohnsullivan.com. Dr. Sullivan is also the editor of VP of HR, an e-newsletter providing "out of the box" solutions for senior HR managers. Free subscriptions can be obtained on his website.