Apple recently lost its iconic iPhone designer to OpenAI and another iconic designer to Meta. The loss of two of Apple’s icons should be considered a warning sign of things to come. Apple has been known for years for its exceptional retention rate among its senior executives. Smart recruiting leaders …
Read More »Articles
The Costliest Failure In Recruiting – “Settling” For The Number 2 Candidate
You won’t hire a number 2 candidate for a critical job after you discover the high cost of settling. The definition of “settling” includes “accepting less than the best.” To me, that doesn’t sound like a desirable recruiting result. Until now, after losing your number one candidate, you most likely …
Read More »Competitor Talent Mapping – A Powerful Recruiting Tool That No One Uses (Despite its numerous benefits)
Competitor talent mapping identifies the best recruiting targets at your competitors. This competitive intelligence approach’s strength is identifying top talent at your competitors before you need to recruit them. So that there is time to assess thoroughly, and in some cases, build a relationship with them. This extra pre-hire time …
Read More »Strategic Omissions – High Impact Things That HR Should Be Doing (But Isn’t)
Our chaotic world requires continually adding new capabilities on top of our existing ones. And even though you may have little time and even less budget. Talent leaders need to find a way to identify and add the new capabilities that your changing environment requires. So, this article lists the …
Read More »A Holiday Opportunity… To Cherry Pick Top Talent (Learn why there’s a surplus of talent and little competition)
You’re sure to land top talent if you recruit when the supply is high and the competition is low! Fortunately, we are now experiencing this high supply-to-low-competition ratio. It will remain that way during the rest of this year (2025). So, even if you have limited recruiting resources, realize that …
Read More »Should Recruiters Give A Hiring Preference To Disadvantaged Candidates? (Or should they avoid acting like social workers?)
A think piece… of arguments that challenge the popular view. Recruiters love to help, so without giving it a second thought and without formal approval, some regularly provide a hiring preference to candidates from underdog or disadvantaged groups that frequently struggle to get a good job. However, in the interest …
Read More »Your Job Postings Are Boring Top Performers! (A list of excitement-triggering phrases that cover “the work”)
Job posts have an astonishing 90% failure rate because only 10% of those who view them apply. Fortunately, you can cut that failure rate for your most valuable recruiting targets (top performers) by up to one third. By merely shifting the content of your job posts away from listing job …
Read More »Government Shutdown Recruiting – A Listicle Highlighting Its Many Benefits
The shutdown has forced millions of well-trained and experienced employees to consider a new job. So why not target and then cherry-pick from among the most desirable ones? During this time period, many federal employees and contractors are thoroughly frustrated. To show you why you shouldn’t pass up this rare …
Read More »Pay To Apply… And Other Ways To Discourage Spam Job Applications From AI Agents
With record applications (up 45%), mostly from AI agents, 20% of employers are considering pay to apply. “Pay to apply” is a process for discouraging the shotgunning of applications by charging a small application fee to candidates. And incidentally, the “AI agents” driving this massive increase in resumes aren’t people. …
Read More »How AI Is Making Today’s Recruiting Impossible (How to handle AI-generated resumes, applicant volume, and perfect resumes)
Because 62% of resumes contain AI-generated content, most employers (61%) have learned that AI resumes make candidates look more qualified than they really are. So now 78% of companies must check for AI use. And sadly, 62% of them have had to bear the expense of firing new-hires whose job skills didn’t …
Read More »
Dr John Sullivan Talent Management Thought Leadership